Criteria

Fail (0 – 49%)

Pass (50-64%)

Credit (65-74%)

Distinction (75-84%)

High Distinction (85 – 100%)

Understanding of statistical inference about single populations (30%)

You have a basic understanding of the hypothesis testing for single populations, although there are a

few errors.

You can understand the hypothesis testingfor single populations despite minor

errors.

You can understand the hypothesis testingfor single populations correctly and

demonstrate the stepsclearly

Understanding of statistical inference about two populations (30%)

You have a basic understanding of the hypothesis testing for two populations, although there are a

few errors.

You can understand the hypothesis testing for two populations despite minor

errors.

You can understand the hypothesis testing for two populations correctly and

demonstrate the stepsclearly

Understanding of two types of errors (15%)

Effectiveness of communication (15%)

Your written

communication is poor.

Your written communication is easy to follow.

Your written communication is clear and succinct to anabove-average standard.

Your written

communication is clear and

succinct to a veryhigh standard.

Your written communication is clear and succinct to an exceptionally high standard.

You have not used an academically appropriate writing style.

You have used an academically appropriate writingstyle.

You have used an

academically appropriate writing styleto an above-average standard.

You have used an

academically appropriate writing styleto a very high standard.

You have used an academically appropriate writing style to an exceptionally high standard.

Criteria

Fail (0 – 49%)

Pass (50-64%)

Credit (65-74%)

Distinction (75-84%)

Clarity of presentation (2 pts)

Your presentation was not clear(e.g., because it was difficult to follow your argument, your props or diagrams wereunnecessary or difficult to

follow, or you did not pronounce your words well).

Your presentation was sufficiently clear to your intended audience (of business professionals) (e.g., becauseit was easy to follow your argument, your props or diagrams were relevant, and you spoke clearly).

Your presentation was clear to an above- average standard.

Your presentation was clear to a very high standard.

Your presentation was clear to an exceptional standard.

Depth of knowledge of presenter

(2 pts)

You did not demonstrate that you possessed enough knowledge of the subject matter of the presentation (e.g., because of the language

you used, becauseof your answersto unrehearsed questions or because of the examples yougave).

You demonstrated enoughdepth of knowledge of the subjectmatter of thepresentation (e.g., because of thelanguage you used,your

answers to unrehearsed questions or the examples you gave).

You demonstrated

knowledge of the subject matter of the presentation to an

above-average standard.

You demonstrated knowledge of the subject matter of the presentation to a very high standard.

You demonstrated

knowledge of the subject matter of the presentation to an exceptional standard.

Level         of                  audience engagement

(2 pts)

You failed to engage youraudience (e.g., because you failed to create opportunities for audience

engagement, dressed inappropriately or started/finished the presentation late).

You sufficiently engaged your audience (e.g., because you created opportunities for audience engagement, dressed appropriately and started/finished on time).

You sufficiently engaged your audience to an above-average standard.

You sufficiently engaged your audience to a very high standard.

You sufficiently engaged your audience to an exceptional standard.

Completion of formalpeer and self-evaluation

(2 pts)

You failed to complete the formal peer and self-evaluation form or failed to  complete it adequately (e.g., because your comments were brief or genuine).

You completed the formal and self- evaluation form to a satisfactory standard (e.g., because your comments werethoughtful and genuine).

You completed the formal peer and self-

evaluation to an above-average standard.

You completed the formal peer and self-

evaluation to a veryhigh standard.

You completed the formal peer and self- evaluation to an exceptional standard.

Your contribution to the group assessment task (as assessed by reference to peer andself-evaluation and

your                                lecturer’s observations)

(2 pts)

Your contribution to the group task was below the expected standard (e.g.,in terms of time on task,

academic rigour of contribution,

cooperation with others or keepingto agreed deadlines etc).

You contributed to the group task to a sufficient standard(e.g., in terms of time on task, academic rigour of

contribution, cooperation with others, keeping to agreeddeadlines etc).

You contributed to the group task to an above- average standard.

You contributed to the group task to a very highstandard.

You contributed to the group task to an exceptionally high standard.