2023 Semester 2
| Subject Code | BUS610 / ICT610 |
|---|---|
| Subject Name | Applied Project |
| Assessment Number and Title | Assessment 4 – Final Presentation and Viva Voce |
| Assessment Type | Individual (Invigilated) |
| Length / Duration | Max. 20 Slides / 15 Minutes — 8 to 10 minutes presentation followed by 5 Minutes of Answering Questions |
| Weighting % | 20% |
| Total Marks | 100 |
| Submission | Presentation to a Supervisor and students' group — Upload PPT Slides on Moodle Site submission link. — File name: A4_YourFirstName_YourNumber |
| Due Date | Sunday, Week 11 23:59 |
| Format | Presentation will be live using MS PowerPoint |
| Schedule of presentation | Available with supervisor in week 10 meeting |
Students will present their final report, model(s), or artefact(s) of the conducted research study. The assessment will consist of a face-to-face (individual) oral presentation.
Presentation will cover all the key aspects of the conducted research followed by question answers from the reviewer(s).
Student groups (4/5 members) will be scheduled to attend a presentation session, and you will present to them and a supervisor face-to-face. It is mandatory to attend the presentation to pass this unit.
This assessment will be marked by the supervisor using the marking rubric. Students may be required to attend the presentation session as part of the learning activity. The supervisor's mark will be recorded as Assessment 4 score.
Students are expected to attend their allocated presentation session and respectfully observe other presentations where scheduled. Attendance and professional conduct during the session may be monitored by the supervisor.
BUS610 / ICT610 Assessment 4 – Final Presentation — Page 1 of 3
| Marking Criteria | Not Satisfactory (0–49% of the criterion mark) | Satisfactory (50–64% of the criterion mark) | Good (65–74% of the criterion mark) | Very Good (75–84% of the criterion mark) | Excellent (85–100% of the criterion mark) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of research objectives, scope, and methodology (30%) | Lack of evidence of comprehensive knowledge in the topic. Majority of information irrelevant to the selected research objectives, scope, and methodology. | Basic information about the research background and lack of evidence of comprehensive knowledge of the research objectives, scope, and methodology. | Has given a factual and/or conceptual knowledge of the research objectives, scope, and methodology. | Reasonable knowledge of background of research objectives, scope, and methodology, and very good level of awareness of application of the research. | Extensive comprehension knowledge of the research topic showed complete understanding of the research objectives, scope, and methodology. |
| Presentation of analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion (30%) | Lack of evidence of adequate understanding of the selected analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion. Not all the content addressed in the presentation. | Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion of the research. Presented only a few elements of the research. | Has given a factual and/or conceptual knowledge and skills based of the research analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion has addressed majority of elements. | Good knowledge and skills of research analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion. Some minor items are missing from the report. | Has excellent skills in research analysis, interpretation, findings, and conclusion. The presentation was a concise summary of the comprehensive applied project. |
| Communication Skills and Answering Questions (25%) | Lack of evidence of minimal communication skills such as body language and eye contact. Minimal eye contact and focusing on small part of audience. The presenter did not get the audience engaged. | Evidence of basic communication skills. Minimal body language was used by the presenters. Minimal evidence of engaging the audience. | Evidence of good oral communication skills. Some members spoke to majority of audience, steady eye contact. The audience was engaged by the presentation. | Most members spoke to majority of audience; very good body language, suitable volume speaking level, regular eye contact. The audience was engaged by the presentation. | Has excellent skills in oral communication. Excellent body language, speaking volume & regular eye contact. The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience's attention. |
| Visual Appeal — Presentation slides, clarity, grammar, spelling and engaging (15%) | Lack of evidence of written presentation skills (no visual appeal). The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | Evidence of basic skills of communicating in marketing environment. Minimal effort made to make slides appealing. | Has given a factual and/or conceptual skill base in communication (writing) in marketing environment. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. In some slides, too much information on two or more slides. | Has very good skills in communicating (writing) a marketing plan. Very good visual appeal without errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) in marketing environment. There are no errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging. |
Note: This report is provided as a sample for reference purposes only. For further guidance, detailed solutions, or personalized assignment support, please contact us directly.
Final Presentation & Viva Voce (Creative Example)
Research Topic
“The Impact of Teleworking on Employee Productivity: The Mediating Role of Employee Motivation”
Slide 1 — Title Slide
Applied Project Final Presentation
Presentation Title:
The Impact of Teleworking on Employee Productivity
Slide 2 — Introduction
Background of the Study
Problem Statement
Organizations are unsure whether teleworking positively affects employee productivity in the long term.
Slide 3 — Research Aim
Aim of the Research
To investigate the relationship between teleworking and employee productivity and examine whether employee motivation mediates this relationship.
Slide 4 — Research Objectives
Research Objectives
Slide 5 — Research Questions
Research Questions
Slide 6 — Literature Review
Key Literature Findings
Previous Studies Found:
Research Gap
Limited studies explore the mediating role of motivation in teleworking productivity.
Slide 7 — Conceptual Framework
Research Framework
Independent Variable
Mediating Variable
Dependent Variable
Hypothesis
Teleworking positively affects productivity through employee motivation.
Slide 8 — Research Methodology
Methodology
Research Design
Data Collection
Sample Size
Sampling Technique
Analysis Tool
Slide 9 — Data Collection Process
Data Collection
Survey Sections
Slide 10 — Demographic Analysis
Participant Demographics
Gender Distribution
Age Groups
Work Experience
Slide 11 — Findings
Key Findings
Finding 1
Teleworking increased flexibility and reduced commuting stress.
Finding 2
Employees reported higher motivation due to work-life balance.
Finding 3
Motivated employees showed higher productivity levels.
Slide 12 — Statistical Analysis
Correlation Results
| Variables | Correlation |
|---|---|
| Teleworking & Productivity | 0.72 |
| Teleworking & Motivation | 0.69 |
| Motivation & Productivity | 0.81 |
Interpretation
Strong positive relationships were identified between all variables.
Slide 13 — Discussion
Discussion of Findings
Comparison with Literature
Results align with previous studies on remote work effectiveness.
Slide 14 — Recommendations
Recommendations
For Organizations
For Employees
Slide 15 — Limitations
Study Limitations
Slide 16 — Future Research
Future Research Directions
Slide 17 — Conclusion
Conclusion
Slide 18 — Thank You
Questions & Answers
Thank You for Listening
Viva Voce Sample Questions & Answers
Q1. Why did you choose this topic?
I selected this topic because teleworking has become a major workplace trend after COVID-19, and organizations want to understand its impact on employee productivity.
Q2. Why did you use quantitative research?
Quantitative research allowed me to collect numerical data and statistically analyze relationships between variables.
Q3. What is the main finding of your study?
The study found that employee motivation plays an important mediating role between teleworking and productivity.
Q4. What challenges did you face?
The biggest challenge was collecting survey responses within the limited timeframe.
Q5. What recommendation would you give organizations?
Organizations should adopt flexible work policies and focus on employee engagement to maintain productivity.
Tips to Score High (HD/Distinction)
Communication
Slide Design
Presentation Delivery
Viva Voce
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
