HI6035 IS Governance and Risk T2 2025 Individual Assignment Help

HI6035 IS Governance and Risk T2 2025

 

Individual Assignment

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines                
Trimester T2 2025
Unit Code HI6035
Unit Title IS Governance and Risk
Assessment Type Individual Assignment 
Weight 50 % 
Word limit (if applicable)2500words 
Submission Guidelines 
  • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. 
  • The assignment must be in MS Word format unless otherwise specified.     

Academic Integrity

Information

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
Penalties
  • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time, along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.
  • Your answers must be based on Holmes Institute syllabus of this unit. Outside sources may not amount to more than 10% of any answer and must be correctly referenced in full.  Over-reliance on outside sources will be penalised
  • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing.

Individual Assignment Guidelines and Specifications

 

Objectives:- This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student learning skills and to give students experience in researching literature on a topic relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter,critically analyzing current academic papers then presenting idea or questions and expected outcomes with clarity and definition in a referenced.

written report.

Objectives:

  1. To enhance your ability to analyse governance frameworks within an organizational context.
  2. To develop practical risk management strategies using industry-standard methodologies.
  3. To critically evaluate the impact of governance and risk management on information systems operations.

Assignment Details:

Case Study Analysis: You can choose a case study,from the provided list, that describes a business scenario involving governance and risk issues from the last 5 years Journals or conferences paper. Carefully read and analyse the case to understand the underlying governance challenges and risks.

Governance Framework Assessment:

  1. Prepare a Governance Framework using one of the appropriate IS Governance frameworks (e.g., COBIT, ITIL, ISO/IEC 38500).
  2. Analysis: Critically assess the prepared framework's ability to address the governance challenges identified in the case study.
  3. Implementation Plan: Propose a plan for implementing the framework within the organization, including key roles, responsibilities, and processes.

Risk Management Strategy:

  1. Risk Identification: Identify the key risks associated with the IS operations described in the case study.
  2. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the likelihood and impact of these risks using a recognized risk assessment methodology.
  3. Mitigation Plan: Develop a risk mitigation plan that includes preventive, detective, and corrective controls.


Expected Outcomes:

Discuss the expected outcomes of implementing your governance and risk management strategies, including potential benefits, challenges, and impacts on organizational performance.

Key Elements of the Assessment:

  1. Introduction: Provide a synopsis of the case study and explain the background on the governance and risk issues, including an identification of gaps in the current approach.
  2. Governance Framework: Prepare a governance framework, including its strengths, weaknesses, and applicability to the case study.
  3. Risk Management: Present a comprehensive risk management strategy, detailing the identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks.
  4. Implementation: Discuss the practical steps for implementing your governance and risk management strategies within the organization.
  5. Conclusion: Summarize your findings and suggest areas for further improvement of the governance framework and Risk Management framework.

Marking Scheme:

CriteriaExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactory

Introduction

Weight 20.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Introduction is very clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

60.00 to 79.00 %

Mostly consistent logical and convincing introduction.

40.00 to 59.00 %

Adequately consistent, logical and convincing introduction.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Vague or incomplete introduction.

Selection of articles

Weight 20.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

High quality 10 articles that are very suitable for the topic has been selected.

60.00 to 79.00 %

10 articles that are very suitable for the topic has been selected.

40.00 to 59.00 %

Some articles that are related have been chosen, with some of the articles are not relevant or outdated.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Incomplete submission or mostly irrelevant articles.

Discussion

Weight 40.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

60.00 to 79.00 %

Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

40.00 to 59.00 %

Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

0.00 to 39.00 %

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Conclusion

Weight 10.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Assessed critically in depth and suggested excellent conclusion logically and presented in very convincing manner

60.00 to 79.00 %

Assessed well and suggested conclusion logically and presented in well manner

40.00 to 59.00 %

Assessed and suggested an adequate conclusion.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Conclusion is confused and disjointed.

Adapted Harvard Referencing

Weight 10.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

60.00 to 79.00 %

Generally good referencing style

40.00 to 59.00 %

Sometimes clear referencing style

0.00 to 39.00 %

Lacks consistency with many errors

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.